Radio Free Kafiristan

Why do Muslims think the Bible has been corrupted?  We know that this must be true for Muslims because the Quran contradicts what is written in the Bible.  So, who are we to believe?  All of the extant documents demonstrating that it hasn't?  The continuity the Bible has with the writings of the earliest church fathers?  The consistency of the Old and New Testament in their relationship with one another?  The historicity of the Old and New Testament?  The archeological evidence demonstrating the truth of the events in both the Old and New Testaments?  When confronted with this question we must simply ask what has been corrupted and what existing evidence is there for this corruption?

Or --- are we to believe a single sourced, internally contradictory - historically inaccurate - theologically incoherent - self serving book that pretty much screws up every Biblical event it portends to comment on? 

Sunday I want to address some of the inherent problems the Quran presents.  In order for the Old and New Testament to be true --- the Quran must be false.  However, In order for the Quran to be true, all of the Old and New Testament (written by over 40 authors, on three different continents, in at least three different languages, over a period of 1500 years) must be false.  Any objectively thinking human being knows the answer to this - but Sunday I am going to give you the facts as to why we know that there is no way the Quran is from God, Allah, a god, or anyone else other than the self proclaimed prophet of Islam who plagiarized the Jewish Talmud, Gnostic writings, and Zoroastrian folklore.    

Shalom - Eric