Email us for help
Loading...
Premium support
Log Out
Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy have changed. We think you'll like them better this way.
"SO WHAT WAS IT THAT COLLIDED OR CRASHED INTO PHOBOS 2, THE "SOMETHING THAT SHOULD NOT
BE THERE"? What does the last frame or frames, still secret, show? In his careful words to AW&ST, the chairman of the Soviet equivalent of NASA referred to that last frame when he tried to explain the sudden loss of contact, saying, "One image appears to include an odd-shaped object between the spacecraft and Mars." If not "debris ," or dust or a "jettisoned part of Phobos 2" what was the "object" that all accounts of the incident now admit collided with the spacecraft--an object with an impact strong enough to put the spacecraft into a spin, an object whose image was captured by the last photographic frame? "We just don't know," said the chief of the Soviet space program.
But the evidence of an ancient space base on Mars and the odd-shaped "shadow " in its skies add up to an awesome conclusion : What the secret frames hide is evidence that the loss of Phobos 2 was not an accident but an incident. Perhaps the first incident in a Star Wars--the shooting down by Aliens from another planet of a spacecraft from Earth intruding on their Martian base.
Has it occurred to the readers that the Soviet space chief's answer, "We just don't know" what the "odd-shaped object between the spacecraft and Mars" was, is tantamount to calling it a UFO--an Unidentified Flying Object? For decades now, ever since the phenomenon of what was first called Flying Saucers and later UFOs became a worldwide enigma, no self-respecting scientist would touch the subject even with a foot pole--except, that is, to ridicule the phenomenon and whoever was foolish enough to take it seriously